Vol. 17 No. 1, January 2021

I was going to talk this month about a couple of pursuits and attacks of Unit 4, Base 27: SC 36, SC 321 and SC 98. But something that came to mind as I was looking at Unit 4 is the seeming randomness of the chaser arrangements, in terms of which boats ended up where, and how the units were put together.

Occasionally I receive questions about hull details among chasers in the same unit, of the variety, "If I see a certain type of depth charge rack on one chaser in a unit, is it a safe bet that the others in the unit would have the same type?" Or it's about hull numbers in the same range: "If I see a sprung deck on SC 91, would I expect to see that on SC 92?" The short answer is, not really a safe bet, but maybe.

Since SC 91 and SC 92 were both built at Elco, for example, maybe SC 92 has a sprung deck also, but I wouldn't bet too much on it. And chasers in the same unit could have been built anywhere, and fitted with racks and other equipment at different locations. 

Details like the type of rack or even what variety of deck gun the boat has is likely more a question of what was available at the time and location it was acquired. As for how a given trio of chasers ended up together in a unit, I suspect it was a matter of when the chasers were completed and commissioned, and which crews happened to be trained at the same time; and beyond that, a question of the available officers and who was in charge of making the assignments. Would love any thoughts on this, if I've missed a likely answer. Here are a few details, for Unit 4:

SC 36: Built at New York Naval Shipyard
SC 321: Built at Lugers Marine Construction, Stamford, CT.
SC 98: Built at Elco, Bayonne, NJ.

SC 36: 23 January, 1918 at New York
SC 321: 2 January, 1918 at New York
SC 98: 25 January, 1918, at New York

Arrived at New London, CT. (for training)
SC 36:  21 February, 1918
SC 321: 21 February, 1918
SC 98: 8 March, 1918

Left New London for overseas:
SC 36: 25 April, 1918 
SC 321: 25 April, 1918
SC 98: 25 April, 1918

Subchaser SC 98 marked AT
Subchaser SC 98 shown with hull marking "AT." G.S. Dole Collection

But, so that I don't entirely ignore the ongoing theme, I should note that there is a personal account of a pursuit and attack by this unit here, from a crewman on SC 36: https://www.subchaser.org/100-years/1918-september-2 .

Best wishes for a better year in 2021!

Todd Woofenden, editor

Fine Print

To receive the Subchaser Archives Notes via email, use the signup form here. The Notes are posted monthly. If you have non-commercial messages (on topic) for the next Subchaser Archives Notes, submit them to the Subchaser Archives Editor.